Who is the smallest running back in the NFL, and does size really matter in the end zone?

The NFL has always been a league where size and strength are often celebrated, but the smallest running backs have proven time and time again that heart, agility, and determination can outweigh sheer physical stature. When discussing the smallest running back in the NFL, one name that often comes to mind is Darren Sproles. Standing at just 5'6" and weighing around 190 pounds, Sproles defied the odds and became one of the most dynamic and versatile players in NFL history. But is he truly the smallest, and what does his success say about the role of size in football?

The Case for Darren Sproles

Darren Sproles, who retired in 2019, was a force to be reckoned with during his 15-year career. Despite his diminutive size, Sproles was a nightmare for defenders due to his speed, elusiveness, and ability to catch passes out of the backfield. He amassed over 19,000 all-purpose yards, scored 55 touchdowns, and earned three Pro Bowl selections. Sproles’ success challenges the conventional wisdom that bigger is always better in the NFL. His ability to slip through tackles and explode into open space made him a valuable asset for every team he played for, including the Chargers, Saints, and Eagles.

Other Notable Small Running Backs

While Sproles is often cited as the smallest running back, there are other players who have made their mark despite their size. Tarik Cohen of the Chicago Bears, standing at 5'6" and weighing 191 pounds, is another example. Cohen, known for his quickness and ability to make defenders miss, has been a key player in the Bears’ offense when healthy. Similarly, Boston Scott of the Philadelphia Eagles, at 5'6" and 203 pounds, has shown flashes of brilliance, particularly in short-yardage situations.

Does Size Matter?

The success of these smaller running backs raises an important question: does size really matter in the NFL? While larger running backs like Derrick Henry (6'3", 247 pounds) dominate with their power and ability to break tackles, smaller backs bring a different skill set to the table. Their lower center of gravity can make them harder to bring down, and their agility allows them to navigate through tight spaces that larger backs might struggle with. Additionally, smaller running backs often excel in the passing game, making them dual-threat players who can line up in the slot or even return punts and kicks.

The Evolution of the Running Back Position

The NFL has seen a shift in how running backs are utilized over the years. Gone are the days when every team relied on a single workhorse back to carry the load. Modern offenses often employ a committee approach, with different backs specializing in different roles. This has opened the door for smaller, more versatile players to thrive. Teams are now more willing to invest in backs who can contribute in multiple ways, whether it’s as a runner, receiver, or special teams player.

The Mental Game

Another factor that can’t be overlooked is the mental toughness required to succeed as a smaller running back in the NFL. These players often face skepticism and doubt throughout their careers, from high school to the pros. Overcoming that adversity requires a unique mindset and an unshakable belief in one’s abilities. Sproles, Cohen, and others like them have proven that with the right attitude and work ethic, size is just a number.

The Future of Small Running Backs

As the NFL continues to evolve, it’s likely that we’ll see more smaller running backs making an impact. The increasing emphasis on speed and versatility in modern offenses means that players who can do a little bit of everything will always have a place in the league. While they may never be the prototypical “bell cow” backs of yesteryear, their ability to contribute in multiple phases of the game ensures that they’ll remain valuable assets for years to come.

Conclusion

So, who is the smallest running back in the NFL? While Darren Sproles is often the first name that comes to mind, there are several players who have proven that size isn’t everything. Their success challenges traditional notions of what a running back should look like and highlights the importance of skill, determination, and versatility. As the NFL continues to evolve, it’s clear that smaller backs will continue to play a vital role in shaping the future of the game.

Q&A:

Q: Who is currently the smallest running back in the NFL?
A: As of the 2023 season, Boston Scott of the Philadelphia Eagles, standing at 5'6", is one of the smallest running backs in the league.

Q: Can smaller running backs be effective in short-yardage situations?
A: Yes, smaller running backs like Boston Scott have shown that they can be effective in short-yardage situations due to their low center of gravity and quickness.

Q: How do smaller running backs compare to larger backs in terms of durability?
A: While smaller backs may be more prone to injuries due to their size, their agility and ability to avoid direct hits can sometimes make them more durable than larger backs who take more punishment.

Q: What are the advantages of having a smaller running back on the roster?
A: Smaller running backs often bring versatility, speed, and the ability to contribute in the passing game, making them valuable assets in modern NFL offenses.

Q: Are there any Hall of Fame running backs who were considered small?
A: While not in the Hall of Fame yet, Darren Sproles is often mentioned as a potential candidate due to his impressive career stats and versatility.